In reply to:
@evanphx @drbrain @jbarnette I'm convinced. @veganstraightedge Approved™.
-
In reply to:
@evanphx @drbrain @jbarnette Right. And future files (if any) could be gems.whatever.rb, keeping them similar and sorted together.
In reply to:@drbrain @evanphx @jbarnette Both very fair points. Good stinking.
In reply to:@drbrain @evanphx @jbarnette On a scale of 1 to Not Worth It™, how hard would it be to scan the rubygems / github ruby projects for gems.rb?
In reply to:@evanphx @jbarnette Why the double word / double dot? Why not gems.rb?