I've further commented on the "Open Conference Expectations" adding my thoughts about a "Priority of Constituencies".

@susie_c *What* and *the fuck?!*

@deadprogram Ask @eliduke.

RT @jason_Curran: If you don't follow me, DO NOT retweet me

I chimed in on this "Open Conference Expectations" thing.

https://gist.github.com/3098860#gistcomment-371793

@blowmage So many of these comments are really blog posts. :/

@blowmage I've got a lot to say about this. I just want to finish reading it all before I chime in.

Still. Reading.

@blowmage Will do. It's weird coming into this thing even just a day late.

@jessicaspacekat ow ow!

This OCE thing is the most comments that I've ever actually read through. Still reading before I comment too.

https://gist.github.com/3098860

RE: OCE –

I think it's most important for organizers to communicate to their speakers what the terms are. Don't like them? Don't speak.

@16toads @adactio I use "conflict" as HTML5 WG uses it.

http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies

RT @Dolly_Parton: The way I see it, if you want the rainbow, you gotta put up with the rain.

@gruber iTunes uses ⌘F to make a video fullscreen.

RE: "OCE" –

In case of conflict, consider attendees over speakers over sponsors over organizers over theoretical purity.